Hardison v. King

Dan T. Matrafajlo

An Appellate Division case that arose out of an appeal of a trial court’s decision granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In other words, the trial court Judge felt the law prevented Mr. Hardison from seeking monetary damages for his injuries since he had three prior injuries to the same body parts. In disagreement with the Judges determination an Appeal was filed. At the Appellate Division, which comprises of a three-Judge panel, the Court reversed the trial court’s finding which created a narrow exception to the then existing law.

Charges Dismissed: DWI, Refusal to Submit to Breath Testing, Failure to Report Accident, Failure to

DWI, unsafe lane change, careless driving, and improper passing were all DISMISSED

Perreira v. Rediger

My client, Matt Pinter, was stopped

After petitioner pled guilty and served

Dan T. Matrafajlo argued for the plaintiff

View All Results
Free Case Evaluation
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Testimonials

Miranda is outstanding. Extremely professional, organized and helpful!

Chris Imparato

Miranda Arruda is a phenomenal asset to the team! She demonstrates outstanding paralegal service through her responsiveness and organization.

Cassie Witte